vastimg.blogg.se

1. #Adobe premiere pro vs final cut pro movie
2. #Adobe premiere pro vs final cut pro 720p
3. #Adobe premiere pro vs final cut pro software

That means that over time, Adobe Premiere is radically more expensive. On the other hand, Adobe Premiere charges a monthly subscription fee that is currently costing $240 per year. You buy it and you’re done! It’s currently going for approximately $300. Final Cut Pro is less expensive in the long runįinal Cut Pro has a one time fee. But you won’t have the option of using Final Cut Pro. Many editors do prefer to work on a Mac anyway, but if that’s not you, you’re still going to be able to use a quality editing program on your PC. This is definitely an advantage if you don’t own a Mac. On the other hand, Adobe Premiere Pro can be used on both a Mac and a PC. I’ll share some things you’ll want to consider to help you make your choice.Īdobe Premiere Pro is more versatile when it comes to hardwareįinal Cut Pro is only designed to be used on a Mac based system. However, most small companies will have to choose between one or the other. But which is better? At my video editing services company, Ball Media Innovations, we use them both. While they have a lot in common, there are some important differences. They are Adobe Premiere Pro and Final Cut Pro.

#Adobe premiere pro vs final cut pro software

Many video editors find that they have to choose between two of the most popular video editing software programs.

It’s easier to hire editors with Adobe Premiere Pro.Final Cut Pro is quicker and maybe even easier.Familiarity makes Adobe Premiere Pro comfortable for many editors.Final Cut Pro is less expensive in the long run.Adobe Premiere Pro is more versatile when it comes to hardware.By Greg Ball, President of Ball Media Innovations, Inc.If it were faster and more efficient for what I do, I'd reconsider it. strange, but I didn't find it too difficult to become used to it. There's no transcoding happening, but the file I/O for those massive files slows the whole process down significantly.īecause I don't have years of experience editing with NLEs, I'm not married to any particular UI. FCPX can't just open those raw, it insists on putting a MOV wrapper around the footage. Also, Apple still can't get the whole "edit the source footage raw" bit right my source footage is all spanned-clip AVCHD, with files that are over 4G a piece.

#Adobe premiere pro vs final cut pro movie

The newer version of Final Cut Pro X is substantially faster at exporting my movie than the older version. The new Mac Pro and Premiere Pro CC: 1/2t - epsilon The old Mac Pro and Premiere Pro CC: 1/2t + epsilon The new Mac Pro and new Final Cut Pro X 10.1: 1/2t + epsilon

The old Mac Pro and Final Cut Pro X 10.0: 2t

If we assume the length of the movie is represented by 't' (for time).

#Adobe premiere pro vs final cut pro 720p

I have a specific benchmark that I run on an NLE when I'm testing it: how long does it take to export one of my movies to a 720p h.264 MP4? I've posted this in other threads here: I've tried the Final Cut Pro X 30 day trial on my old Mac Pro 5,1 (heavily modified) and my new Mac Pro 6,1 (8-core, D700s). I am just wondering about your experience with final cut pro and adobe premiere and which you like better and why.